Intended for publication on VFC's Stock House only. No re-publications authorized.
After a
week of rebound and volatility, shares of Cytosorbents dropped right back into the high twenties during the last half day of trading on Friday. The drop was accompanied by a sharp increase in volume, especially right around the three o'clock time frame that cemented the day's decline.
Also on Friday, the website webGadget.com
published a short, but negative, article about Cytosorbents which may or may not have led to the decline of the CTSO share price.
It's my opinion that negative articles such as this one do not along cause sell-offs or spikes in mentioned stocks, because most investors do enough DD to support their investment decisions and wouldn't be influenced by such shoddy 'reporting'. But I do think that the big boys like to use articles such as this as a technique to create enough doubt around a company to convince the more unconvinced and fence-sitting investors to sell into the decline that is created by - not the article - but the manipulative actions of whichever entity wants the share price lowered.
This article by medGadget, in particular, reminds me of the slash job on Dendreon that took place in 2010.
With DNDN,
CNBC made a curiously-timed "reporting error" that induced a sharp decline in the share price. Then, a short time later, an
anonymous email came to the attack which only added to the manipulated uncertainty behind the company that had
just received FDA approval for the cancer vaccine Provenge.
That dip, much like the one that CTSO is experiencing right now, created quite the buying opportunity for those that might have missed out on the initial run.
Coincidence? I don't believe in coincidences like these.
The medGadget report is anonymous, just like the anonymous email that attacked Dendreon.
Additionally, there is more space devoted to the Cytosorbents press release than there is to actual commentary - and the commentary is weak, at best, and relates to the anonymous opinion that CytoSorb may not receive FDA approval.
The truth is, anyone looking towards FDA approval understands that it wouldn't be a short term catalyst anyway. The immediate potential of this stock is based on the
European approval and commercialization of the product that is due to take place later this year. To go negative on the subject of a potential FDA approval right now is a fruitless and almost irelevant argument, and it looks more like someone is trying to paint a negative opinion of the company, while ignoring the positives that have - and could - still take place.
I've mentioned it a few times since the approval of CytoSorb in Europe that this announcement caught a lot of people and potential investors by surprise. Additionally, many who invest in the biotech sector these days actually wait on the sidelines for news to hit before jumping in - makes for a more "sure thing" investment over the long haul.
However, in order to still get in at a good price after positive news hits the wires, the shares need to be forced down.
Is this all my opinion? Yes, but take a look at the
shady price action of AVNR just an hour before releasing positive news last year, not to mention the shady action of Dendreon on numerous occasions over the years, including my above-mentioned example of how anonymous emails and articles can play a role.
We all know that this manipulation and shady activity takes place. Not only is each and every week accompanied by an SEC-related arrest these days for stock manipulation, but the kingpin himself, Jim Cramer, is all over the Internet describing how easy it is to manipulate the markets.
The truth is, it's not entirely a bad thing. If that is what's going on behind the scenes with the CTSO share price, then the little guy is able to pick up shares for a discount as well.
Regardless of how medGadget or any other anonymous entity tries to swing this one, the fact is that Cytosorbents just released some milestone news for the company. To gain CE Mark Approval before all the data was in has me believing that the data that the regulators did see was pretty convincing.
The potential of this company and its flagship product is pretty significant, and I'm not even considering the FDA right now, as medGadget did.
Dilution could become a factor, granted, but so can potential partnerships and a commercial launch later this year.
I wouldn't be too concerned with the Cytosorbents slide. There's still quite a bit of time between now and revenues, so that means that there's still quite a bit of time for volatility - but that doesn't take away from the potential.
Disclosure: Long CTSO.